2008 Renault Clio vs. 2011 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2011 Dodge Ram is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Renault Clio would be higher. At 6,690 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1552 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 2011 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Dodge Ram (827 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 722 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Clio | 2011 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Renault | Dodge |
Model | Clio | Ram |
Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 6690 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 350 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 827 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 2537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 129 L |