2008 Renault Clio vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Renault Clio would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Clio | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Renault | Holden |
Model | Clio | Commodore |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 5976 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |