2008 Renault Clio vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 2 weights approximately 61 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 2 (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio. 2012 Mazda 2 has automatic transmission and 2008 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2008 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mazda 2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Clio | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Renault | Mazda |
Model | Clio | 2 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1500 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 43 L |