2008 Renault Kangoo vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Renault Kangoo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2008 Renault Kangoo. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2008 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2008 Renault Kangoo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Kangoo. (185 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Renault Kangoo | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Renault | Triumph |
| Model | Kangoo | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1460 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |
