2008 Renault Kangoo vs. 2013 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Renault Kangoo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Renault Kangoo would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volkswagen Eos (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2008 Renault Kangoo. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 2008 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 190 kg more than 2008 Renault Kangoo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Renault Kangoo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volkswagen Eos. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Kangoo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volkswagen Eos (281 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Kangoo. (180 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Kangoo. 2013 Volkswagen Eos has automatic transmission and 2008 Renault Kangoo has manual transmission. 2008 Renault Kangoo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Volkswagen Eos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Kangoo | 2013 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Renault | Volkswagen |
Model | Kangoo | Eos |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Panel Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1869 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 1595 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1443 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |