2008 Renault Megane vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Renault Megane is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Renault Megane (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Megane weights approximately 155 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Megane (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Megane | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Renault | Triumph |
Model | Megane | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1869 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |