2008 Renault Megane vs. 1982 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2008 Renault Megane is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Megane weights approximately 215 kg more than 1982 Zastava 1500.
Because 1982 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Megane (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Megane | 1982 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Renault | Zastava |
Model | Megane | 1500 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 113 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2430 mm |