2008 Renault Megane vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Megane. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Megane | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Renault | Renault |
Model | Megane | Clio |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 17.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 198 km/hour | 174 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.2 seconds | 12.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 4.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |