2008 Renault Megane vs. 2013 Volvo C70
To start off, 2013 Volvo C70 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Renault Megane would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo C70 weights approximately 575 kg more than 2008 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Megane. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Megane | 2013 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Megane | C70 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 198 km/hour | 235 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.9 seconds | 8.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1751 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4615 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2640 mm |