2008 Renault Scenic vs. 2000 Acura EL
To start off, 2008 Renault Scenic is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura EL would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Scenic weights approximately 461 kg more than 2000 Acura EL.
Because 2008 Renault Scenic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Acura EL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Scenic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Scenic (188 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Acura EL. (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Scenic | 2000 Acura EL | |
Make | Renault | Acura |
Model | Scenic | EL |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
Torque | 188 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2619 mm |