2008 Renault Scenic vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Renault Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Renault Scenic would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Renault Scenic (133 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Scenic | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Renault | Nissan |
Model | Scenic | Pixo |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 195 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.3 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2360 mm |