2008 Rover 25 vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2008 Rover 25 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2008 Rover 25. (100 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 880 kg more than 2008 Rover 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 25. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Rover 25 | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | 25 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1992 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 434 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 19.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 2010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 87 L |
