2008 Rover 25 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Rover 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Rover 25 would be higher. At 1,992 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Rover 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2008 Rover 25. (100 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 25.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 25 (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Rover 25 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | 25 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1992 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |
