2008 Rover 75 vs. 1965 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (257 HP) has 205 more horse power than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 485 kg more than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Rover 75 | 1965 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Rover | Volkswagen |
Model | 75 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 257 HP | 52 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.4 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 40 L |