2008 Rover 75 vs. 1966 Simca 1300
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Simca 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Simca 1300 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 545 kg more than 1966 Simca 1300.
Because 1966 Simca 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Simca 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Simca 1300. (102 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Simca 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Rover 75 | 1966 Simca 1300 | |
Make | Rover | Simca |
Model | 75 | 1300 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1289 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |