2008 Rover 75 vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 785 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Because 1968 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Rover 75 | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Rover | ZAZ |
Model | 75 | 966 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 887 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2170 mm |