2008 Rover 75 vs. 1978 Seat 133

To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Seat 133 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1978 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1978 Seat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 846 kg more than 1978 Seat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Seat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Seat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Seat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Seat 133.

Compare all specifications: