2008 Rover 75 vs. 2001 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota MR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota MR2 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota MR2 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Because 2001 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota MR2. (170 Nm). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Rover 75 | 2001 Toyota MR2 | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | 75 | MR2 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1799 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 140 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2470 mm |
