2008 Rover 75 vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,398 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 245 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Rover 75 | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 75 | Tundra |
Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 215 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3270 mm |