2008 Rover 75 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 695 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Rover 75 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Rover | Subaru |
Model | 75 | R2 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 658 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 45 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 30 L |