2008 Rover 75 vs. 2005 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Highlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Highlander would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (257 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Highlander. (230 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Highlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 266 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Highlander (314 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (245 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Rover 75 | 2005 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 75 | Highlander |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 3309 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 257 HP | 230 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 314 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1681 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 73 L |