2008 Rover 75 vs. 2006 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Volkswagen Citi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Volkswagen Citi would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (72 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (108 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Rover 75 | 2006 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Rover | Volkswagen |
Model | 75 | Citi |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1423 cc |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 151 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.6 seconds | 11.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 49 L |