2008 Rover 75 vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Rover 75 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75. 2009 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 2008 Rover 75 has manual transmission. 2008 Rover 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Rover 75 | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Rover | Holden |
| Model | 75 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
