2008 Rover 75 vs. 2012 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2012 Nissan Rogue is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 86 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Rogue. (170 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Rogue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 71 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Rover 75 | 2012 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Rover | Nissan |
Model | 75 | Rogue |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1486 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4656 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |