2008 Rover 75 vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 329 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-Z.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (174 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Rover 75 | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Rover | Honda |
| Model | 75 | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1497 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.4 : 1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2435 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 40 L |
