2008 Saturn Outlook vs. 2011 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Saturn Outlook. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Saturn Outlook would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Saturn Outlook (276 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2011 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Commodore.
Because 2011 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Saturn Outlook (340 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2008 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Commodore. 2008 Saturn Outlook has automatic transmission and 2011 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2011 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Saturn Outlook will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Saturn Outlook | 2011 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Saturn | Holden |
Model | Outlook | Commodore |
Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 340 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |