2008 Smart Ultimate 112 vs. 2001 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Sienna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Sienna would be higher. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Sienna (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Because 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Sienna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Sienna (280 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2001 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | 2001 Toyota Sienna | |
| Make | Smart | Toyota |
| Model | Ultimate 112 | Sienna |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 151 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1870 mm |
