2008 Smart Ultimate 112 vs. 2010 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2010 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler Sebring (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Because 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chrysler Sebring (220 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | 2010 Chrysler Sebring | |
| Make | Smart | Chrysler |
| Model | Ultimate 112 | Sebring |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 151 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1850 mm |
