2008 SsangYong Musso vs. 2009 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 143 more horse power than 2008 SsangYong Musso. (217 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2008 SsangYong Musso.

Because 2008 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 SsangYong Musso (307 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2008 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore. 2008 SsangYong Musso has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 SsangYong Musso will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2008 SsangYong Musso 2009 Holden Commodore
Make SsangYong Holden
Model Musso Commodore
Year Released 2008 2009
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3199 cc 5976 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 217 HP 360 HP
Torque 307 Nm 290 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Fuel Consumption Overall 16.5 L/100km 14.4 L/100km