2008 Subaru Forester vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 2008 Subaru Forester is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Subaru Forester weights approximately 292 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Because 2008 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Triumph 2.5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Subaru Forester (320 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2.5. (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Subaru Forester | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
| Make | Subaru | Triumph |
| Model | Forester | 2.5 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2457 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 222 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 205 km/hour | 171 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 1133 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |
