2008 Subaru Forester vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Subaru Forester is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Subaru Forester has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Subaru Forester will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Subaru Forester | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Subaru | Ford |
| Model | Forester | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2457 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2490 mm |
