2008 Suzuki Reno vs. 2005 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2008 Suzuki Reno is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volkswagen Citi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volkswagen Citi would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Suzuki Reno (127 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Citi. (72 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Citi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 630 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Citi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Citi. (108 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2008 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Citi.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Suzuki Reno | 2005 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Suzuki | Volkswagen |
Model | Reno | Citi |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1423 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 850 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 49 L |