2008 Suzuki Reno vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Suzuki Reno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Suzuki Reno would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2008 Suzuki Reno. (127 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2008 Suzuki Reno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 80 kg more than 2008 Suzuki Reno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Suzuki Reno. (178 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Suzuki Reno. 2010 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 2008 Suzuki Reno has manual transmission. 2008 Suzuki Reno will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Suzuki Reno | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Suzuki | Cadillac |
Model | Reno | BLS |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2792 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 58 L |