2008 Suzuki Reno vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Suzuki Reno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Suzuki Reno would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 375 more horse power than 2008 Suzuki Reno. (128 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2008 Suzuki Reno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XK weights approximately 735 kg more than 2008 Suzuki Reno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (625 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 447 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Suzuki Reno. (178 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Suzuki Reno | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Suzuki | Jaguar |
Model | Reno | XK |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 503 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 625 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 11.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4794 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2032 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1322 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2752 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 14.1 L/100km |