2008 Tata Nano vs. 1999 Renault Megane
To start off, 2008 Tata Nano is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Megane (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2008 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2008 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Megane weights approximately 715 kg more than 2008 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Megane (200 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Tata Nano. 1999 Renault Megane has automatic transmission and 2008 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2008 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Megane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Tata Nano | 1999 Renault Megane | |
Make | Tata | Renault |
Model | Nano | Megane |
Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 624 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 48 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.5 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1315 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3099 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1495 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1652 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 70 L |