2008 Tata Nano vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Tata Nano is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2008 Tata Nano. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2008 Tata Nano.
Because 2008 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Tata Nano | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Tata | Ford |
Model | Nano | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 624 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3099 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1495 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1652 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2490 mm |