2008 Tata Nano vs. 2004 Opel Signum
To start off, 2008 Tata Nano is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Opel Signum. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Opel Signum would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Opel Signum is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Opel Signum (208 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2008 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Opel Signum should accelerate faster than 2008 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Opel Signum weights approximately 995 kg more than 2008 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Opel Signum, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Opel Signum (300 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Opel Signum will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Tata Nano. 2004 Opel Signum has automatic transmission and 2008 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2008 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Opel Signum will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Tata Nano | 2004 Opel Signum | |
| Make | Tata | Opel |
| Model | Nano | Signum |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 624 cc | 3175 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 48 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73.5 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 237 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1595 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3099 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1495 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1652 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.2 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 52 L |
