2008 Tata Nano vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Tata Nano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Tata Nano would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 205 more horse power than 2008 Tata Nano. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2008 Tata Nano.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Tata Nano | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Tata | Holden |
Model | Nano | Commodore |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 624 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 48 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.2 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |