2008 Tata Nano vs. 2009 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Korando is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Tata Nano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Tata Nano would be higher. At 3,198 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SsangYong Korando (209 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 2008 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 2008 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 1265 kg more than 2008 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Tata Nano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 SsangYong Korando (307 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Tata Nano. 2009 SsangYong Korando has automatic transmission and 2008 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2008 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 SsangYong Korando will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Tata Nano | 2009 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Tata | SsangYong |
| Model | Nano | Korando |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 624 cc | 3198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 209 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 48 Nm | 307 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73.5 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3099 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1495 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1652 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.2 L/100km | 15.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 70 L |
