2008 Tata Nano vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Tata Nano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Tata Nano would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 2008 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2008 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Falcon weights approximately 1104 kg more than 2008 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Falcon (391 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Tata Nano. 2010 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 2008 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2008 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Tata Nano | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Tata | Ford |
| Model | Nano | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 624 cc | 3983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 48 Nm | 391 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73.5 mm | 92.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 99.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1704 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3099 mm | 4967 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1495 mm | 1868 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1652 mm | 1433 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2838 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.2 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 68 L |
