2008 Toyota 4Runner vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota 4Runner (237 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 182 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota 4Runner (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Toyota 4Runner | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Toyota | Triumph |
Model | 4Runner | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3956 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 361 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1352 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 64 L |