2008 Toyota Aygo vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Toyota Aygo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Toyota Aygo would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2008 Toyota Aygo. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2008 Toyota Aygo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Aygo. (93 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Aygo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Toyota Aygo | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Toyota | Nissan |
Model | Aygo | Micra |
Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 93 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3405 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1615 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.6 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 46 L |