2008 Toyota Condor vs. 1963 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 2,986 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 1007 kg more than 1963 Triumph Spitfire.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Triumph Spitfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Spitfire. (91 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Toyota Condor | 1963 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Toyota | Triumph |
Model | Condor | Spitfire |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1147 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Torque | 192 Nm | 91 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.6 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1712 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 40 L |