2008 Toyota Condor vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 50 kg more than 1983 Volvo 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Volvo 240 (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1983 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Toyota Condor | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Condor | 240 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1812 cc | 2127 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2660 mm |
