2008 Toyota Condor vs. 1994 Mazda Midge

To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. Both 2008 Toyota Condor and 1994 Mazda Midge are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 396 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge.

Because 2008 Toyota Condor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Toyota Condor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge. 1994 Mazda Midge has automatic transmission and 2008 Toyota Condor has manual transmission. 2008 Toyota Condor will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Mazda Midge will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: