2008 Toyota Condor vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 2,986 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 236 kg more than 2000 Volvo S60.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S60 (330 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Toyota Condor | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Condor | S60 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2319 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 246 HP |
Torque | 192 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.6 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1712 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |