2008 Toyota Condor vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 2,436 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 21 kg more than 2004 Volvo S60.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo S60 (401 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Toyota Condor | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Condor | S60 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2436 cc | 2401 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
Torque | 195 Nm | 401 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 93.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1646 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |