2008 Toyota Condor vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Toyota Condor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Toyota Condor would be higher. At 2,986 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 177 kg more than 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander (226 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Toyota Condor | 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Toyota | Mitsubishi |
Model | Condor | Outlander |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2400 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Torque | 192 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1712 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 63 L |