2008 Toyota Condor vs. 2010 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2010 Nissan NP300 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Toyota Condor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Toyota Condor would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan NP300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan NP300 weights approximately 170 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan NP300 (169 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Toyota Condor | 2010 Nissan NP300 | |
| Make | Toyota | Nissan |
| Model | Condor | NP300 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 169 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |
