2008 Toyota Condor vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Toyota Condor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Toyota Condor would be higher. At 2,986 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 516 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-Z.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Honda CR-Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (174 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Toyota Condor | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | Condor | CR-Z |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 192 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.6 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.2:1 | 10.4 : 1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1712 kg | 1196 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2435 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 40 L |